Ondansetron has largely been shown to be safe during pregnancy; it is also a critical option for women with severe NVP into their second trimester. Ondansetron may be the only thing some women are able to take that helps them out of bed and gives them any kind of relief.
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash
The Bottom Line

The use of ondansetron during pregnancy is intensely debated due to its significant effectiveness in most women with NVP/HG, but controversial safety profile.  

Most studies agree that ondansetron, overall, is not associated with major birth defects. However, associations have been made to cardiac septum defects and cleft lip and/or palate.  These results are also inconsistent, and not every study has found these associations. 

International obstetric organizations recommended that based on current evidence, ondansetron should be used after vitamin B6 alone or with doxylamine, as well as some antihistamines, or after the first trimester when the heart and facial palate have already formed.

Studies also note, however, especially in women with severe symptoms in the first trimester, that the risk of cardiac defects or cleft lip and/or palate due to ondansetron use is still assessed to be very low.

Women with severe symptoms, who are experiencing serious complications, may determine, with their HCP, that the benefits of ondansetron use may outweigh its potential risks. Women need to have an extensive risks and benefits conversation with their HCP prior to its use; this can also help women feel more comfortable and less anxious/guilt about their decision.

Further, women should also be reminded that the lack of safety data, as well as consistency, is not necessarily due to ondansetron itself, but how research is conducted on medications and pregnancy.

Jump to:
Share on:


Ondansetron is a very popular and effective antiemetic (anti-nausea medication) for post-operative, chemotherapy-induced, and general nausea and vomiting. It is often the medication of choice given to women for NVP in the United States who visit the emergency department, as well as those diagnosed with Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG).

Ondansetron use increased from less than 1% of pregnancies in 2001 to 22.2% in 2014, with the highest use in the first trimester. Further, in 2008, ondansetron prescriptions for NVP increased from 50,000 each month in 2008, to 110,000 each month by the end of 2013.

Overall, and in comparison to other antiemetics, ondansetron has been shown to be very effective at reducing NVP symptoms in women with varying degrees of NVP severity, including women with HG. Further, ondansetron does not produce the adverse sedative effects of other medications.

Some women with severe HG may require a "Zofran® pump".

Some women have such severe NVP they will be prescribed a “Zofran® pump” – a medical device in which a catheter is inserted into the abdomen/thigh via a needle, which is then removed while the catheter stays in place. The “pump” administers low doses of ondansetron 24-hours a day. There is very limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and adverse effects of these pumps, to include average time women have them, and the overall cost of the pump.

Women can submit their "Zofran® pump" experience here or at the bottom of this page.

Ondansetron works as a 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor antagonist. It is assessed that nausea and vomiting can be induced through the release of 5-HT3 within the body, which has receptors in the GI tract and the central nervous system – ondansetron blocks this action.

However, it is still unclear exactly what type of effect ondansetron has in decreasing symptoms, or why it is so effective in some women. At least one study found no difference in serotonin levels among pregnant women with HG and pregnant women without HG, as well as non-pregnant women. Further, ondansetron is not completely effective across the board in women with NVP.



Safety regarding ondansetron during pregnancy – especially during the first trimester – is controversial, mostly due to the dramatic inconsistency of results, and the level of detail needed to fully assess individual findings. However, most studies are reassuring:

Overall, and based on data from published studies from 2004 to 2020, ondansetron does not appear to be associated with an increased risk for major malformations above baseline. Further, ondansetron has not been associated with miscarriages or low birth weight.

Ondansetron is metabolized similarly in pregnant women as non-pregnant women.

Regarding the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron during pregnancy, one study analyzed plasma samples from 20 non-pregnant women and 40 pregnant women following a single 4 or 8 mg dose, umbilical cord blood at delivery, and from newborns at birth. 

The results indicated that pregnancy does not affect uptake of ondansetron. It was also found to cross the placenta and is cleared less quickly in the newborn in comparison to the mother (the study was addressing whether ondansetron can be used in newborns to prevent narcotic withdrawal).  However, another study indicated that although transfer through the placenta is probable, it is likely a limited amount (Elkomy et al. 2015; Kennedy D. 2016).

In a large, multicenter cohort study published in April 2021, there was no association between ondansetron exposure (anti-nausea medication) during pregnancy and increased risk of fetal death, pregnancy loss, stillbirth, or major birth defects compared with exposure to other anti-nausea drugs.

However, three studies (2013 to 2019) identified a small increased risk of cardiac defects with the use of ondansetron in the first trimester.

Interestingly, an additional study using the same large data set as one of the studies above, and published the same year (2013), did not reach this conclusion, and determined ondansetron was not teratogenic.

According to a 2014 literature review associated with the Motherisk Program, the author noted, “the fact that the same large registry in Denmark (897,018 vs. 608,385) can be investigated to yield such opposing results is concerning” and more research and clarity was needed.

Additional studies published in 2016 and 2018 did not find an increased risk of cardiac malformations with ondansetron use.

A separate May 2016 review noted that despite a possible increased risk for cardiac defects, a finding not replicated in other studies, the overall risk of birth defects associated with ondansetron exposure appears to be low.

Regarding how ondansetron could cause cardiac malformations, it is theorized that ondansetron can block HERG (gene) potassium channels to the heart, theoretically causing heart rhythm disturbances in the embryo, depending on the dose. This was confirmed in animal studies using doses higher than human doses. This effect can be exacerbated with low potassium, which can occur with severe electrolyte imbalance (and therefore, severe NVP/HG). However, further studies are necessary to understand this mechanism.

Ondansetron use in the first trimester has also been associated with an increased risk for cleft lip and/or palate.

The nasal and maxillary processes of the face fuse to form the upper lip. The two palatine shelves fuse to complete the soft palate (mouth/nose).  If fusion does not occur correctly, a cleft lip or cleft palate occurs at the boundary (sources differ dramatically on timing; fusion may occur anywhere between 10 and 14 weeks of pregnancy; average appears to be 10 weeks).

A separate study published in April 2016 did not find an association between ondansetron and birth defects, including cleft lip and/or palate or cardiac malformations.  Conversely, the study found evidence suggesting that women who took ondansetron were less likely to have a miscarriage or a stillbirth. The authors also indicated that extreme NVP itself could be a cause of adverse findings.

The mechanism for how ondansetron could cause cleft lip and/or palate is not clear.

A large studied published in August 2018 found an association between renal agenesis-dysgenesis (missing one or both kidneys); this finding has not yet been replicated in follow-on studies and requires additional research.

Note: While ondansetron is used "off-label" during pregnancy, this does not mean it is because the medication is unsafe; it means it has not gone through the official approval process of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), similarly to almost all drugs used during pregnancy (read more).

Organizational Guidelines/ Recommendations

As of 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends, that if symptoms persist, ondansetron be tried after wrist acupressure/stimulation (SeaBands®), ginger capsules, vitamin B6, vitamin B6 and doxylamine, and various antihistamines.

However, it is also possible that women's symptoms may be too severe at their first appointment, at which point HCPs may skip these steps and prescribe ondansetron or metoclopramide (Reglan®), which are on the same "line" on ACOG's treatment algorithm (see Resources).

ACOG recommends women also be counseled regarding the available data as well as the risks and benefits of ondansetron use prior to 10 weeks of gestation.

In August 2019, the European Medicine’s Agency (EMA) wrote that ondansetron was suspected to cause orofacial malformations during the first trimester of pregnancy. However, they also noted this evidence was inconsistent, and animal studies did not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects regarding reproductive toxicity. Regardless, EMA concluded that ondansetron should be avoided in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Of note, EMA also noted that cardiac septal defects and oral cleft are not rare occurrences during pregnancy. Congenital heart defects are the most common cause of major congenital anomalies and isolated orofacial clefts are one of the most common types of birth defects in the United States, adding to the nuance of evaluating all existing data.

Further, in December 2020, researchers from The European Network of Teratology Information Services wrote that implementation of the regulatory step by the EMA is not well-evidenced and does not serve the interest of pregnant women with severe nausea and vomiting. (Note: Teratology is the study of teratogens, "outside" factors that can be harmful during pregnancy). 

The 2016 United Kingdom (U.K.) Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines and the U.K. Teratology Information Service (UKTIS) stated the use of ondansetron should be limited to patients who are not adequately managed on other antiemetics (antihistamines) and preferably used after the first trimester of pregnancy, although it was deemed “safe and effective”.

Like ACOG, RCOG/UKTIS also indicated women should be counseled regarding the benefits of ondansetron together with the small increase in risk of orofacial cleft which may exist.

UKTIS further noted the background risk for orofacial cleft is 11 per 10,000 pregnancies; the risk of orofacial cleft is 14 per 10,000 pregnancies following ondansetron use in the first trimester.

In January 2020, the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency noted there is a growing body of evidence on the use of ondansetron in pregnancy that does not suggest an increase in the risk of overall congenital malformations combined; however, ondansetron may be associated with a small fetal increased risk of cleft lip and/or cleft palate.

A clinical trial regarding safety and effectiveness of ondansetron and mirtazapine in HG patients is underway.

The aim of the clinical trial (March 2019) is to investigate the efficacy of mirtazapine and ondansetron as treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum. The setup is a double-blind multi-center trial where patients suffering from HG will be randomized to treatment with either mirtazapine, ondansetron or placebo. Study results are anticipated by October 2021 (NCT03785691).

The Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMAZ) indicated in their 2020 NVP guidelines that ondansetron should be used as a “second-line agent”.  SOMAZ further noted ondansetron does not appear to increase the overall risk of birth defects, may be more effective than B6 and doxylamine, but constipation can be quite severe and needs to be managed adequately. Ondansetron also needs to be avoided in women with pre-existing QT prolongation (See Maternal Adverse Effects).

A 2016 review evaluating the safety of ondansetron indicated that ondansetron use after 10 to 12 weeks of pregnancy may minimize the risks of teratogenicity and would be particularly advised in women who have persistent symptoms after the use of front-line options.

Maternal Adverse Effects

While ondansetron is less sedating than other antiemetics, it can cause headache, fatigue, and constipation. A stool softener may be recommended/prescribed in women who have severe constipation when using ondansetron.

According to the FDA, additional common adverse side effects of ondansetron include anxiety, irritability, weakness, dry mouth, chills, drowsiness, insomnia, and diarrhea.

Because ondansetron helps prevent nausea and vomiting by blocking serotonin, serotonin can accumulate and lead to serotonin syndrome, which is essentially a type of poisoning that is life threatening. However, this is more likely to occur in women taking more than one serotonin blocker/SSRI.

Ondansetron is not recommended for women with pre-existing QT prolongation.

Ondansetron can prolong the QT interval (the heart taking longer to "recharge" between beats) with chronic use due to ondansetron's HERG blocking properties. 

To help mitigate this, in December 2012, the FDA announced the removal of the 32-mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron from the market because of the potential risk of QT interval prolongation, which could leading to torsade de pointes, a potentially fatal heart rhythm.  

This led to the recommendation that ondansetron should not be given intravenously in doses greater than 16 mg, and women with certain risk factors should be monitored while on ondansetron. Women on ondansetron for NVP are normally given 4 mg to 8 mg oral doses (ACOG, 2018; FDA, 2017).

There are many contraindications to using ondansetron, and HCPs may want women off all other antiemetics, antihistamines, and/or SSRIs while taking it. Women need to discuss all risks and benefits, side effects, and contradictions of taking the medication with their HCP.


Women should have a risks and benefits conversation with their HCP regarding the use of ondansetron, taking into consideration all currently available data and recommendations.

Women should also consider sharing their NVP experience below, especially if their experience included taking any form of medication for their symptoms, such as ondansetron. This can help other women talk to their HCP and gain additional perspectives on this condition when diet and lifestyle changes have failed to work.


Algorithm for Treatment of NVP  (page 18; Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2011)

The Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy and Hyperemesis Gravidarum (algorithm page 25 and 26; U.K. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists)

Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy (Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2011 Jun)

Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy-What’s New? (Auton Neurosci. 2017 Jan)

Morning Sickness: Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists)

Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy: Committee Opinion 189; January 2018 (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists)


Test ToolTip

    Sign up to read 3 pages for free or subscribe now for full site access.